Plan One or Multiple Deployments
What
WeA haveDeployment establishedgroups one or more payload assignments under shared delivery rules. Put assignments together when their timing, installation method, Kiosk behavior, and licensing rules should be managed as one unit.
Decide before you group assignments
Split assignments into separate Deployments when any of these settings need to differ:
| Setting | Use separate Deployments when |
|---|---|
| Assignment type | Some content installs automatically, appears in |
| Activation | Payloads need different start or end dates |
| Installation timing | Payloads need different installation windows |
| Kiosk rules | Items need different self-service visibility or presentation |
| Deployment on request | Only some payloads or |
| Payload requirements | Platform, Booster, or runtime requirements do not match |
Fewer Deployments are easier to maintain only when the assignments genuinely share the same deploymentrules.
Example
Suppose of the metadata would be the same. For example, I want toyou deploy Firefox and Chrome to the IT and HR departments starting on Friday at 6 PM. Everything matches, so I can put them in the same deployment…but, should I?
When/Why
We’ll want to very carefully think about how we intend to organize our deployments, and how we’ll want to modify them in future before we can answer the above question.
How
But the answer to the question is “it depends”. It depends on what is easiest for you, the FileWave administrator. Primarily you’ll want to organize deployments based on the payload(s), or based on the destination(s), but not both at the same time. Other key differentiators are going to be the method of delivery (i.e. push vs. pull) and the platform.
An example (always) works best:
Let’s consider the following table of overall payloads/destinations…
So, how would we best create as few deployments as possible?
Create
oneRelated Content
- How Are Deployments Different than Associations?
- Convert Associations to
mix platforms), and we’d probably name them something like this: Optional Apps PC (Kiosk)Deployments
And we arranged them in that way because now we have some excellent base building blocks for adding other apps if the destinations are the same (i.e. the All groups). For instance, if we added a new installer, say MSFT Teams, then we can easily simply add it to the proper deployments, and it would be available to all of the same devices with the same options.